The Pundit Oct 21
Report of our workshop about and held at convention. Thanks to and
Reply Retweet Like
Net7 s.r.l. - Pisa Oct 21
Thanks to and for the report on workshop at
Reply Retweet Like
DiXiT Oct 19
Semantic web in practice: report on workshop at | DiXiT blog
Reply Retweet Like
sam kaislaniemi Oct 8
Finally caught up on () tweets from last month; will now RT furiously.
Reply Retweet Like
Tim Causer Sep 20
Huge thanks to all at , for being so hospitable, and especially to and for the warm welcome!
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 18
Back home again after a great convention. Thanks again to the organizers and all the other great people there!
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 18
My belated summary: philosophical and practical, preservation and curation, exclusive and inclusive, where do we go from here
Reply Retweet Like
lorna hughes Sep 18
Thanks so much to all the lovely people for such a warm welcome and kind hospitality. Hope to see you all again soon!
Reply Retweet Like
Reinoud Oosting Sep 18
Yes, you are right. But I'm glad I had a nice impression of the conference on the basis of your tweets.
Reply Retweet Like
oculardexterity Sep 18
Too many tools
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 18
gets question from audience: "Doesn't your focus on Libs risk turning DH into Digital Curation?" LH" Bring DH into DC.
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
Speaking of jobs . . . anyone want to move to Thunder Bay? (CRC in New Media & Literary Culture)
Reply Retweet Like
mishaoutloud Sep 18
"Maybe text editing, as a community, doesn't blow its own horn enough." at
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
At worries that digital editing is being marginalised in by things that are more "funky and à la page"
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 18
2/2 5 Digital vs printed edition 6 IT-person and/or Humanities scholar 7 XSLT & XQuery or Python? 8 Scholarly core and presentation
Reply Retweet Like
Reinoud Oosting Sep 18
Does she meam mere data without interpretation?
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 18
What I take home 1/2 1 Short term funding vs sustainability 2 Standards vs flexiblity 3 Stand-off vs mark-up 4 Work, text, documents
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
Lorna Hughes: We need to rock publishing i.e. shake publishing to its core
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 18
P&G is good, too. But Raz all the way. 's current talk is so choice. Rock publishing to its core!
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 18
Co-production, collaboration, sustainability and re-productivity for digital editing in a culture of abundance
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
Lorna Hughes: Make content re-usable for *unknowable* purposes.
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 18
“I have no idea what people will do with my archive in 10 yrs time, but I want to make sure they are able to do that”
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
Lorna Hughes: " liberating the content from the way it is delvered "
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 18
. is my jam. Open collaboration enhances knowledge production and user-engagement.
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
Lorna Hughes: Digital Edition Websites: Sustainability problem: The scholarly core cannot be separated from presentation.
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
One might ask when there *hasn't* been existential angst about DH (and what it is/isn't, etc.)?!
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
What does an operational and useful ecosystem of scholarly editions look like? Q. of protocols & interop, or standardisation?
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 18
Digital Humanities TM: impact of digital editing beyond the pointy brackets, closing keynote by at
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 18
"There's some existential angst going on about DH right now" closing the conference by broadening the perspective
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 18
We've come to the final keynote of by . Value and impact of digital editions
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
now will ask us to lift up thine eyes from thine pointy brackets, and look unto the impact.
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
Surely there is a middle ground. Most ppl don't need to reinvent a pan/zoom image viewer (for example)
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
Which world do we want? One where everything is the same vs. variety. At recurring question: Standards vs.single solutions
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
Perfect final of Tuomo Toljamo on Inspiring and different!
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 18
. Thx, Elli! If you're interested: The date search is powered by another web service: PDR Dates
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
Material artefacts have politics. As do tools. (pdf)
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
Wiio's laws: "Communication usually fails, except by accident" Tuomo Toljama at
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 18
Looking forward tot he presentation of DiXiT fellow Tuomo Toljamo, "outlier amongst outliers"
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
Now Tuomo Toljamo of on the material interaction of editorial tools.
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 18
GinoKalkman defends PhD 21/09 on Psalms. Did lot of programming in PhDproject. Ideal combi?
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
Are you sure you are in the middle?
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 18
discusses role of digital scholars, developers, editors, division of tasks and cooperation. Important topics in DH!
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
There's a good point of using appropriate tool/format for the job, but sometimes that is XML/XPath/XSLT/XQuery/etc
Reply Retweet Like
Patrick Sahle Sep 18
missed the didactic aspect in Dekkers talk: I teach humanists XML, then XPath, then XSLT - no paradigm change middle of the road
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
A bit of xml/xslt. More Python and SQL. If you want to publish: A lot of HTML/CSS/Javascript. ah,TeX may come in handy.
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
How concerned is digital editing with production, in taking on the role of publisher/printer in digital form?
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 18
Always interesting to think about what skill set actually matters for digital editing. Ed theory? XML? TEI? XSLT? Python? CSS?
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
What worries me is the insistence on *writing* code rather than *generating* it. Make a factory, not a car.
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
python not good for XML mixed content. Answer: - use more stand-off! - or use one XSLT to transform mixed content in s'thing usable.
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 18
strongly advocates use of Separate the concerns (data, query, presentation) and use the best tool for the job
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
At urges to 'Use the best tool for the job' (but maybe addicted to his python hammer?) ;-)
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 18
Listen to this wonderful German researcher! She is very right.
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 18
There will be a correspondence workshop in Lyon during the TEI Members’ meeting touching on correspSearch, as well
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
PARTICIPATE - Do not just talk about collaboration but participate in useful projects such as correspSearch
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 18
Smart search engine on the correspSearch website: you can search e.g. for "Easter 1794"
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 18
presents correspSearch project . Taking letters as part of larger web of correspondence
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Pierazzo Sep 18
Agreed! But better of the original name! "TEI Nudge", if memory serves :S
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
Now on correspSearch - a service to connect diverse scholarly editions of letters.
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 18
If power should go to the editor, the layout directives need a cleaner language.
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 18
The name „TEI SImple“ is misleading, it’s more like ODD+
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
The link to the simple showcase xquery implementation demonstration is at
Reply Retweet Like
Gertjan Filarski Sep 18
: if you have a programmer, why waste on xslt? Full languages (Python/Java) can add processing, testing & integration?
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
A typo in 's Simple slides. It is <outputRendition> not <outputrendition> (I only note it so she can correct after.
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 18
At explains the Turska Tenet "Maximum expressivity (of processing models) to the Editor" of Simple.
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 18
"Power to the Editor!" presents her tenet on digital editing and TEI simple on the last day of
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
"Simple is not easy!" at
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 18
. desinger is the "make it nice and pretty person" caring about appearance of the source.I think a designer is much more
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Pierazzo Sep 18
Made it to , although only for the vey last bit
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 18
"Layering abstractions is the way to go" starting last day with talk about TEI Simple
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 18
Last day of convention. chairing session on Publication and processing. starting about Simple
Reply Retweet Like
lorna hughes Sep 17
Good morning from The Hague where it is sunny!
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
"Trolling company ... over “shopping cart” patent sues its own attorneys" My last tweet about patents
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 17
Complex text modelling issues behind decisions well illustrated by
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Laurent Romary about annotation. Is TEI redoing OpenAnnotation?
Reply Retweet Like
Annette Strⓐuch Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
CORRECTION: Is an author a person or a name? Standardized encoding is sometimes not so easy as we think at
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Is an other a person or a name? Standardized encoding is sometimes not so easy as we think at
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 17
"Nothing is written, everything is possible" about the TEI... reminiscent of Assassin's Creed
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 17
And explains how we can now get 200 *million* documents in .
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
. now talking about teenage sex aka big data
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
mishaoutloud Sep 17
French national scholarly repository name: HAL. Cuz that couldn't POSSIBLY go wrong.
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Quite some similarities between scholarly publications, patents & standards: authorship network, a.o. at
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
Following now at : the Romary session
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
collation editor for new testament manuscript. Python, Javascript, JSON surround the Java and XML. ++ for
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Robinson Sep 17
-- thought I had posted this already, but don't see it. shows Transkribus attempting to read the Hengwrt ms
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 17
Günter Mühlberger on thanks for the talk and greetings from team
Reply Retweet Like
Patrick Sahle Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 17
. up now talking about and TSX.
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 17
on "transcription made simple" ! Happy to hear about progress at !!!
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Robinson Sep 17
Transkribus is really amazing. Perfect (I mean PERFECT) results with images of Darwin 1859 (print, not manuscript, but still)
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
Gunter Mühlberger presents the tranScriptorium project. His role model perhaps of interest to ?
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 17
Mühlberger mentions 's Berlin Intellectuals as role model for a digital edition.
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Gunter Mühlberger and on making archival collections accessible and the tool
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 17
Are your interfaces good enough for the human and machine readers? 2/2
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 17
Last discussion: apart from philosophical questions, think also about interfaces for humans & machines in your (!) edition 1/2
Reply Retweet Like
Patrick Sahle Sep 17
Günther Mühlberger on Transkribus for large scale transcription
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 17
Gioele and killed it at in their presentation data vs. presentation. It's still a difficult dichotomy!
Reply Retweet Like
Patrick Sahle Sep 17
changing presentation / skins / looks. please compare: vs
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Robinson Sep 17
a computer program can be a thing of beauty? of course! (remember Donald Knuth...). An edition is beautiful because of its coding?
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Kant's distinction between Erscheinung and Ding an such puts whole discussion "Data or presentation" in new light. Marco Segala at
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
For the Dutch: Belcampo's story: De Dingen de Baas, in which the "dinge an sich" strive for world domination.
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
There is beauty in programming. This is a book AND a computer program.
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
"old" web editions can be of historical or philosophical interest as testimonies of a certain period
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
esp. in scholarship and other fields in development where you and others can learn about your mistakes
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 17
. Asks: "Do I have the right to have my previous dev work forgotten?." But why would you want to erase mistakes?
Reply Retweet Like
CCeH Sep 17
the scholarship is in the encoding!
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Robinson Sep 17
And now, as proof that , shows Prue Shaw's wonderful edition of the Commedia! (with extra stemmatics, ha)
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Robinson Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 17
The Walking Archetype
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
Thank you Gioele for a great ‚introduction‘!
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
"The Italian cafe/bar/pub/Biergarten problem“ results in wrong tagging
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Gioele Barabucci "don't tag for the renderer.
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
May I recommend at this point Pocket Earth? Based on OpenStreetMap.
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Good cartography is data selection&presentation. Acquiring new data is no longer the challenge What about editing? Gioele Barabucci
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Gioele Barabucci becomes Borgesian: Can we create the perfect map?
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 17
"Cartography: an ancient Greek word meaning my satnav is broken and I need a map."
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 17
"Data vs. Presentation" on - isn't it complementary?
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
how many tags must an editor scan before (s)he gets to content ...
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
"I'd like to defend the intellectual capacities of editors" says (and hopefully without sarcasm)
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Proper definitions of document, text and work indispensible to digital editing tools. at
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
. mentioning WeGA as an „editing system“ — don’t know if I agree …
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
continues with on Textual Communities showing MSS, transcriptions, comparison Canterbury Tales
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 17
If only Lachmann was still alive to join the discussion...
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini Sep 17
Convincing presentation by Martin Fechner
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 17
ConTeXt used by ediarum:
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 17
Now: Martin Fechner with "ediarum - A Digital Work Environment for Scholarly Editions"
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 17
Oh, and her daughter Irène Joliot-Curie also won a Nobel Prize (shared with her husband).
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 17
Speaking of Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowships: Did you know she’s the only person to ever win a Nobel in two different sciences?
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
"... the document is the mere clay of human language..." gets philosophical at
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
lorna hughes Sep 17
And y'all, my talk is called 'beyond the pointy brackets'.
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 17
Richard Hadden: version control? Shebanq deals with versions in a pragmatic way: labelled snapshots of the whole database.
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 17
redefining - struggling with mass data & heterogeneity in project
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 17
Richard Hadden: "the consumers of the edition data" Intriguing term! Especially the plural.
Reply Retweet Like
James Cummings Sep 17
Didn't mean to ruin 's example of unreadable handwriting by being able to read it. Go Palaeography!
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
To use milestones for overlapping hierarchies is cheating. misha broughton at
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 17
Digital editions still much shaped by conceptualizatuons of "documents". There is so much more potential. misha broughton at
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 17
"How can we combine automated and manual editing effectively?" on day 2 of Looking fwd to answers!
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 17
presenting on data-driven approach
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 17
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 17
(10) Last but not least: Bible Online Learner. - other team - other system - other purpose - same data.
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
(9) To get a feel for how you can tweak shebanq, see the help
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
good points, it's going to be interesting whether the panel on data vs. presentation tomorrow will have same conclusion
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 16
Tonight @ Bierspeciaal Café "De Paas" Dunne Bierkade 16-A depaas.nl + a lot of indonesian food closeby
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Complex source authorship and fuzziness of data sometimes difficult to handle in Dublin Core and other standardizations Felicia Rosu
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 16
How robust does a platform need to be for creating ‘editions.’
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 16
Really like this presentation thinking through Omeka as a platform for editions. Easy access, low bar of entry, free.
Reply Retweet Like
Patrick Sahle Sep 16
van Peursen/Roorda great contribution: text as sequence of objects with arbitrary features and how to realize that model technically
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
Texts are sequences of objects, discussion between & about nature of these objects
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 16
"Let's go LAF!" Dirk Roorda on stand-off annotation and the Hebrew Bible
Reply Retweet Like
Magdalena Turska Sep 16
sneak peek: slides for presentation I will be giving on Friday
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
I feel like the crisis thing may differ from country to country?
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
Some disagreements whether there's a crisis in scholarly publishing or not after talk
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 16
Rethinking publication and business models: explore the collaboration with other players (libraries, archives..)
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 16
Increasingly though, sustainability is a real concern for granting agencies (in my experience).
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 16
Where are the DSE in the electronic publication model? Those wild things seem lost... says
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 16
painting a pretty intense image of the ‘troubled present’ of scholarly publishing, in that it has collapsed.
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
Digital scholarly editing and the troubled economics of scholarly publishing. on libraries, prices, journals, monographs
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
Yes I totally agree.
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 16
Not that I think that should be the way. But we have to engage with the people saying that to survive. IMO
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
If every text is social construction, what is typical of social editing? on multivalence and ambiguity of "social" editing
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 16
currently presenting on (after)lives of "social" in digital scholarly editing !
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
If the way in which s.t. is digitized is not documented, - which is often the case - recreation is impossible. at
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 16
digital editors are custodians of cultural heritage esp when it is in danger says .yes!
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Social role of digital editions. Responsibilities and opportunities. at DH scholars as custodians of cultural heritage
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini Sep 16
At DiXiT Convention presenting the WeGA (and the power of subversion repository post commit hooks)
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 16
did I really say that? :) sounds great!
Reply Retweet Like
Ana van Meegen Sep 16
Learning how to use TEI guidelines
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
Carl Maria von Weber Digital Edition project presented by at Good to see challenges to musicologists also being addressed
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
Interesting lecture! Enjoy the conference. It's worthwhile
Reply Retweet Like
CCeH Sep 16
Just arrived at , how has the hedgehog passed by me, the rabbit, from Heidelberg, where I saw him yesterday
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 16
Sara Norja sums it up well: XML looks pretty ugly, but it makes good data archiving (non-literal quote)
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Continuing with presentation of various edition projects, starting with on editing Middle English Alchemical texts
Reply Retweet Like
Gertjan Filarski Sep 16
@fredfirlefanz: “It’s not revolutionary, but it’s necessary” is the true call to arms for all revolutions.
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
"It's not revolutionary, it's necessary" @FredFirlefanz about the importance of her new approach to classifying and modeling types
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini Sep 16
Now talking about standards and typography: it is better to ask 'How do I describe it' then 'Where do I put it'
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
Type classes should be based on features. Bottom-up, allowing multiple hierarchies @FredFirlefanz at
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
@FredFirlefanz talking about modeling types
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Distinguishing carefully between Type class, Typeface, Font and Type important in edition of Stefan George's work at
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 16
Frederike Neuber about type (in the typesetting sense, not computer science). Donald Knuth would be delighted.
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
"It's more interesting to go into the jungle" -Andreas Speer on the appeal of breaking new ground vs. staying on well-trodden paths
Reply Retweet Like
Dirk Roorda Sep 16
I guess we have to do something about the perceived irratation about databases here!
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Rather than "innovation is the aim, it is nice if it leads to new insight" Funding agencies: note carefully!
Reply Retweet Like
DiXiT Sep 16
We put up a tweet wall for
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
From writing plan & notes to print proofs of by Raymond Brulez provide insight in writing process
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 16
best of luck to you Fran, give them all you've got!!!
Reply Retweet Like
Stefan Dumont Sep 16
Workshop-Hopping. Today: convention in The Hague ...
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Sep 16
Best of luck to my two ladies @FredFirlefanz who will now present on modeling and prototyping editions!
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 16
Digital editions may reach more non/academic readers but receive less scholarly reviews
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 16
Spoiler: my slides for this afternoon at Please shout if you find any errors
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 16
Fascinating projects&keynote by Leo Jansen on digital scholarly editions of artists-1st convention !
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Leo Jansen discusses dilemma printed and/or diigtal edition? Digital ed. not just book turned into digital but other way of editing
Reply Retweet Like
Wido van Peursen Sep 16
Leo Jansen: difficulties to explain complexities of digital Van Gogh letters collection to publishers. Not just collection of files
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
"There's only one thing in life that's definitive and it's not a textual edition" -Leo Jansen
Reply Retweet Like
Gertjan Filarski Sep 16
Attending on-and-off the conference . I'm running around, tackle me when you wish/if you dare :)
Reply Retweet Like
Tessa Sep 16
"There seems to be no life without images" throwaway remark before the first keynote but essential truth imo
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 16
The 1st convention is starting NOW. Thanks to the organizers incl. and - Looking forward!
Reply Retweet Like
Elli Bleeker Sep 15
Goodmorning The Hague! Your lovely, rainy grayness is no indication of our excitement for @FredFirlefanz
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Stadler Sep 15
sitting in the Student Hotel in The Hague, finishing my slides for tomorrow’s — anyone else around?
Reply Retweet Like
The Pundit Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
The Pundit Sep 15
The workshop at the is coming to an end... nice to see Pundit performing that good, thanks to all partecipants
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 15
Text modeling - not the same anymore by
Reply Retweet Like
oculardexterity Sep 15
Started using a graph db to experiment with standoff markup. Looked up Tom Hanks' co-actors instead.
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
John Theibault Sep 15
Another happening in the Netherlands now Convention
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Powell Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 15
Looking forward to the "TEI and neighbouring standards" workshop with &
Reply Retweet Like
The Pundit Sep 15
We are at the Convention 1 to present and more info here
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 14
Exciting un-conference meeting ! Coffee, biscuits, voting, and...girls power @FredFirlefanz !
Reply Retweet Like
Frederike Neuber Sep 14
production mode vs. research mode - time/money vs. creativity/innovation
Reply Retweet Like
SHEBANQ ETCBC Sep 10
I will be the subject of a paper by and at next week. Looking forward!
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini Sep 7
After an intense summer school in Maynooth, people are looking forward to The Hague Convention !
Reply Retweet Like
Anna-Maria Sichani Sep 1
Last chance/day to register for convention "Technology, software & standards for the DSE"
Reply Retweet Like
Huygens ING - KNAW Aug 27
Benieuwd naar de technologie voor het maken van digitale edities? Meld je aan voor de DiXiT Convention Week
Reply Retweet Like
Merisa Martinez Aug 25
come see folks in Den Haag for our first convention 16-18 September! Registration closes this week!
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini May 25
Reply Retweet Like
Elena Spadini May 22
Technology,Software,Standards for the DSE CFP until 28 May Keynotes from , , Leo Jansen
Reply Retweet Like